The community garage door was sentenced to 80 % responsibility

The garage door of the community has been sentenced to 80 % liability

This newspaper (Reporter Wu Duo Sisi) Residents of the community do not take the door to the community normally enter and exit the door Instead, I went home from the passage of the underground garage and was injured by the fault gallery door. Who should be responsible for? A few days ago, the Urumqi Municipal Intermediate People\’s Court finally judged that the property company was responsible for 80 %.

One day in July 2019, Li Mouqiang, who lives in a community in Urumqi, copied the lane and returned home from the underground garage passage. Later, Li entered the hospital for treatment. In November 2019, after identification, the level of disability was tenth. In January 2020, Li Mouqiang filed a lawsuit to the Midong District People\’s Court of Urumqi City, asking the property to compensate for misunderstanding, medical expenses, and disabled compensation for more than 120,000 yuan.

The property company said that from the surveillance video provided, it can It is the passage of the traffic vehicle. It is forbidden to pass. As a person who has a complete civil behavior, Li Mouqiang knows that the underground garage is a passage for vehicles or chooses to pass from the passage. There is a subjective error. He should bear the responsibility of accidental injury.

The property company also believes that its management unit and service unit of the community have posted safety signs in various channels in the community and the parts with hidden safety hazards. There are faults and faults. Therefore, Li Mouqiang\’s accidental injury has no direct relationship with the property company.

The video also shows that not only Li Mouqiang returned home through the underground garage channel, but also other residents went home from the underground garage to go home, but the property company did not remind.

The People\’s Court of Midong District believes that the right to live, health, and physical rights of citizens are protected by law. Anyone who violates the human damage to others shall compensate for the reasonable expenses of medical expenses, nursing expenses, and transportation expenses to treat and rehabilitate the revenue due to miscarriage. The property company has not carried out effective and strict management of the underground garage, and has not fulfilled the timely maintenance obligations of the underground garages. Therefore, the losses caused by the accident caused by Li Mouqiang should be liable for compensation.

The court also believes that Li Mouqiang, as a person who has a fully civil ability, should clear It should be determined that Li Mouqiang has a certain fault on the occurrence of the accident. Combined with the actual situation of this case, it is confirmed that the property company and Li Mouqiang should be divided into the fault of the case in accordance with the proportion of 80%and 20%of the responsibility.

In July 2020, the People\’s Court of Midong District made a judgment that the property company compensated Li Mouqiang 104,000 yuan. The property company did not accept it and appealed to the Urumqi Intermediate People\’s Court. Recently, the court made a judgment in the second instance to reject the appeal of the property company and maintain the original judgment.

Source: Workers\’ Daily

/body>