Should I replace the \”entry door\” installed by the developer? After listening to someone else say it, I realized that I was totally wrong.

When we buy a house, we usually spend our life\’s hard-earned money. When decorating it, we want to make it perfect, especially the first line of defense in the home – the security door. We want to replace it with the best one. I always feel that the developer\’s The door is unreliable, is that true? Let’s discuss this issue today. Should we replace the “entry door” installed by the developer?

First choice, let’s take a look at what the owners who have renovated it have to say!

Owner 1: The lock must be changed, but there is no need to change the door. Even if the door is made of cardboard, you have never heard of a thief using an ax to open the door and steal things, right? If you have an enemy, change the door to a stronger one.

Owner 2: There is no need to change it. Just change it to a lock with a higher anti-theft level.

Owner 3: I suggest that it is better to replace the anti-theft door, and the anti-theft door must have a U-shaped anti-pry groove, otherwise no matter how good the lock core is, it will be useless. Most of the developers’ doors do not have them. Yes, but it\’s not a big problem. Remember to lock your door when you go out, otherwise your ID card will be opened.

Owner 4: The property of the community is the key, and the door and lock are only one aspect. I renovated my house without changing the locks or doors. One day I came home and found that the key could not open the lock (the lock was broken). The locksmith company came to force the lock to be opened, which took less than 10 seconds and made no much noise. After this incident, I no longer believe in any super B, C, or super C locks. Community property security is the key.

Owner 5: There is no mine at home, so why do we need to change the door?

Editor\’s suggestion:

The door that the developer gave us for free is indeed not of high quality. So impressive. However, it is not so bad that it is unacceptable. Generally speaking, since a developer\’s house can pass the \”quality inspection\” of the relevant departments, it is enough to prove that it meets the standards.

And in other words, for an amateur thief, a three-ring can get him to the crowbar. For a professional thief, no matter how complicated the lock cylinder is, it cannot withstand a few minutes of tinkering. So there is no need to change it at all, just use an ordinary lock cylinder to prevent small robbers and thieves. There are no other valuables in the house, so professional thieves are really too lazy to visit.

But specific issues need to be analyzed in detail;

First of all, according to needs, for example, the inside opening can be replaced with an outside opening If you open it, you must change it so that you can have an extra shoe cabinet when you enter the door. Depending on the economic conditions, if you have money, you must replace it with a Class A door. The thickness of the Class A door and the texture of the entire door are not comparable to the engineering doors used for development. There is also no squeaking when opening and closing the door, which is also a rule of thumb.

In addition, you don’t need to replace the door, but you can replace it with a smart lock, not to prevent thieves, but just for the convenience of your daily life, so you don’t have to worry anymore. I went out to take out the trash without my key!

Actually, regarding the issue of anti-theft, we really need to guard against gentlemen but not villains. If you really want to steal, there is nothing that can stop a thief. , it’s just a matter of speed!

And you think that it will be safe if you replace it with a good door lock. No, sometimes it is even more unsafe. For example, a classmate’s new house changed to a door that is said to be of the best quality. What is the use of a modified fingerprint lock that is said to be the most high-end? It was stolen within a year? Five times, the entire unit had the best precautions for his house. He told the thieves in disguise that this house was richer than other houses. One was a doorkeeper and the other was a curtain keeper. This was what a caught thief said, and he would only steal from this house. That’s it.

Some of the pictures in this article come from the Internet