Tested to unlock 6,000 times! 15 smart door locks, who is the real king?

Zhen Evaluation

Visual smart door lock

Comparative test subjective evaluation

▲Picture Source Network

Smart door lock

As a new choice for \”home care\”

Everyone has seen a lot in recent years

Password, facial recognition, fingerprint, palm print, remote…

There are various unlocking methods

but there are also \”Unsatisfactory\” times

Unrecognized,Locked out, waiting for after-sales service

When it comes to home safety, we still need to Pay more attention

Shenzhen Consumer Council

Unite the Macao Consumer Council and Zhongshan Consumer Council

Futian District Consumer Council, Baoan District Consumer Council

Select samples of 15 popular door lock brands in the market

Carry out2024 Visual smart door lock

Comparative test subjective evaluation

What are the fingerprint and face recognition rates of smart door locks on the market? If I am locked out, how long will it take for someone to come to deal with it?

Let’s take a look at the results

Video Loading…

Evaluation content

The subjective observation score of this Shenzhen-Australia-China visual smart door lock comparison test is divided into two parts.

Part One

20 evaluators were publicly collected to test 15 smart door locksFace recognition rejection rate and fingerprint recognition rejection rate.

Part 2

The laboratory engineer will call the official after-sales service hotline to report door-to-door maintenance service,Test how often maintenance personnel come to your home for maintenance.

PART 01

Which brand has better face and fingerprint recognition?

Face and fingerprint rejection rate refers to the probability that consumers cannot recognize and unlock normally when they use face and fingerprint unlocking at home. The higher the rejection rate, the better The door lock is more likely to fail to unlock.

A total of 20 adult consumers were recruited for this evaluation. Each consumer conducted facial recognition and fingerprint recognition on 15 smart door lock samples 10 times in the same indoor environment. Recognize 10 times and record the number of failed unlocking attempts with the entered fingerprint and face. Each smart door lock needs to go through 200 face unlocks and 200 fingerprint unlocks.

Face recognition rejects authenticity Rate

Test results:

The face recognition rejection rate of the 15 smart door lock samples is within 5% (failure times 10 times), including Inshuo, Huawei, Xiaomi, Haier, Deschmann, EZVIZ, and TCL brand samples. All successfully unlocked more than 190 times. Among them, Yinshuo brand sample failed 0 times (successfully unlocked 200 times), showing excellent performance.

Fingerprint recognition rejection rate

Test results:

The fingerprint recognition rejection rate of the 15 smart door lock samples is within 5% (the number of failures is 10 times), including Haier, Cadiz, Huawei, Inshuo, Lucker, Deschmann, and EZVIZ brand samples. All successfully unlocked more than 190 times.

Among them, Haier and Caddis brand samples have 0 failed attempts (200 successful unlocks), showing excellent performance.

PART 02

Which brand has better after-sales service?

After-sales service Response timeandThe timeliness of door-to-door maintenance services refers to the situation where a simulated consumer is trapped outside the door and cannot open the door lock using any method (including mechanical key). The service hotline is used to report repairs, the brand’s after-sales service phone response time and the timeliness of on-site maintenance services are provided

After-sales service response time and timeliness

Test results:

Brands whose response time to the national unified service hotline is within 1 minute are:Philips, Haier, Inshuo, Yale, Lucker, Deschmann, Wangli, TCLperformed better.